TBO.com - TBO is Tampa Bay Online

X-Rays Endanger Youth, Report Says

ADVERTISEMENT

By MARILYNN MARCHIONE, The Associated Press

Published: November 29, 2007

Millions of Americans, especially children, are needlessly getting dangerous radiation from "super X-rays" that raise the risk of cancer and are increasingly used to diagnose medical problems, a new report warns.

In a few decades, as many as 2 percent of all cancers in the United States might be because of radiation from CT scans given now, according to the authors of the report.

Some experts say the estimate is overly alarming, but agree with the need to curb tests particularly in children, who are more susceptible to radiation and more likely to develop cancer from it.

"There are some serious concerns about the methodology used," but the authors "have brought to attention some real serious potential public health issues," said Arl Van Moore, head of the American College of Radiology's board of chancellors.

The risk from a single CT, or computed tomography, scan to an individual is small. But "we are very concerned about the built-up public health risk over a long period of time," said Eric J. Hall, who wrote the report with fellow Columbia University medical physicist David J. Brenner.

It was published in the New England Journal of Medicine and paid for by federal grants.

The average American's total radiation exposure has nearly doubled since 1980, largely because of CT scans. Medical radiation accounts for more than half of the population's total exposure; it used to be just one-sixth, and the top source was the normal background rate in the environment, from things such as radon in the soil and cosmic energy from the sun.

A previous study by the same scientists in 2001 led the federal Food and Drug Administration to recommend ways to limit scans and risks in children.

CT use continued to soar, however. About 62 million scans were done in the U.S. last year, up from 3 million in 1980. More than 4 million were in children.

Previous studies suggest that a third of all diagnostic tests are unnecessary, which means that 20 million adults and more than 1 million children getting CT scans are needlessly being put at risk, Brenner and Hall write.

Ultrasound and MRI, or magnetic resonance imaging, scans often are safer options that do not expose people to radiation, they contend.

CT scans became popular because they offer a quick, relatively cheap and painless way to get 3D pictures so detailed they give an almost surgical view into the body.

Physicians use them to evaluate trauma, stomach pain, seizures, chronic headaches, kidney stones and other ailments, especially in busy emergency rooms.

They put out a lot of radiation, however. A CT scan of the chest involves 10 to 15 millisieverts (a measure of dose) versus 0.01 to 0.15 for a regular chest X-ray, 3 for a mammogram and a mere 0.005 for a dental X-ray.

The dose depends on the type of machine and the person - obese people require more radiation than do slim ones - and the risk accumulates over a lifetime.

"Medical care in this country is naturally so fragmented. Any one doctor is not going to be aware of the fact that a particular patient has had three or four CT scans at some point in the past," said Michael Lauer, prevention chief at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

People with chronic problems, such as kidney stones, are likely to get too many scans, said Fred Mettler, radiology chief in the New Mexico Veterans Administration health care system.

Share this:

Loading Comments...

Email Print

ADVERTISEMENT