WFLA News Channel 8 The Tampa Tribune CentroTampa.com

TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online

Print This Print Bookmark and Share XML Feed For This Channel

TBO > News

Ex-Duke Lacrosse Players File Suit

ADVERTISEMENT

Published: October 6, 2007

GREENSBORO, N.C. - Three former Duke lacrosse players falsely accused of rape filed a sweeping federal lawsuit Friday that could return the sensational case to a courtroom, suing disgraced prosecutor Mike Nifong, the city of Durham and the police detectives who handled the investigation.

The lawsuit calls the criminal case against Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans 'one of the most chilling episodes of premeditated police, prosecutorial and scientific misconduct in modern American history.'

It seeks unspecified damages and numerous changes to the way the Durham Police Department handles criminal investigations - including the appointment of a monitor who would have the power to hire, fire and promote department employees, including the chief, for 10 years.

The lawsuit was filed about a month after city officials met with lawyers for the families seeking a $30 million settlement and several legal changes, two people close to the case have told The Associated Press.

Apparently unable, or unwilling, to reach a deal with the families, the city pledged Friday to defend itself and its employees, but not Nifong, who held a state office, or the private DNA testing lab he hired.
City spokeswoman Beverly B. Thompson said the players' complaint 'asserts claims against the city and its employees that appear to be based on untested and unproven legal theories.'

Should the case go to trial, it would extend a legal debacle that began in March 2006, when a woman hired to perform as a stripper at a lacrosse team party told police she had been raped.

The criminal side of the case largely ended in April, when North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper declared the three players innocent victims of Nifong's 'tragic rush to accuse.' In dropping the charges, Cooper said the state's investigation found nothing to corroborate the accuser's story, leading his staff to 'the conclusion that no attack occurred.'

In the months that followed, the state bar stripped Nifong of his law license, concluding he relentlessly pursued a flawed case for political gain. He resigned as Durham County's district attorney and spent a night in jail last month after a judge held him in criminal contempt of court for lying about DNA evidence. He did not immediately return a call Friday seeking comment.

Along with Nifong, the lawsuit names 13 other individual defendants, including former police Chief Steven Chalmers, police investigators Benjamin Himan and Mark Gottlieb, and Brian Meehan, the director of DNA Security, the private lab that conducted the DNA testing that helped unravel the case. Nifong withheld that evidence from defense attorneys for months.

The lawsuit also names Meehan's lab as a defendant, but it does not name the accuser.

Paul Dickinson Jr., a Charlotte lawyer who represents the lab, Meehan and company President Richard Clark, who is also a defendant, said the allegations are false.

The case seeks damages to punish the defendants 'for outrageous conduct pursued out of actual malice' that violated the players' civil rights. It also seeks the creation of an independent committee to publicly review complaints of police misconduct, the improvement of police training procedures, and an injunction prohibiting Meehan and his laboratory from providing reports or expert testimony in court for 10 years.

'They really do feel like they need to be vindicated and money won't do it,' said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. 'They had to spend a year vindicating themselves. I can understand how they would want to have full relief, especially reforming the system if possible.'

Share this:
Loading Comments...
Loading
Print This Print Bookmark and Share XML Feed For This Channel
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles
Oops! Your email could not be sent because of the following errors: