TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online
Bay Area Must Move On Its Transit Future
ADVERTISEMENT
Published: March 18, 2008
Did you know that of the 25 largest metropolitan areas in the United States, only Detroit and Tampa do not have transit systems?
Now, however, with the newly established Tampa Bay Area Transportation Authority (TBARTA), we have the opportunity - a once in a region's lifetime opportunity - to design a transit system with development in mind.
Just think about that - creating an integrated system built with transit-oriented development and development-oriented transit as key strategies - one that galvanizes the interests of all those who care about this community including environmentalists, business people, policymakers and the public alike.
Transit and Development Together
Transit-oriented development (TOD) is integral to a truly functioning transit network because it focuses on connecting people to the places they live and places they go. TOD provides people with travel options to reach their destinations.
Transit stations also are attractive development opportunities that create jobs, spark economic development and guide the direction of smart growth.
TOD also allows people to live within walking distance of efficient public transportation, reducing their dependence on cars. Residents of some TOD in Portland, Oregon, own 50 percent fewer cars compared to Portland residents in suburban locations.
Eliminating vehicles and vehicle trips reduces congestion, produces fewer emissions and uses less fuel, all helping to improve the environment, air quality and quality of life.
In cities with successful transit systems and properly located transit stations, TOD is able to create premiums for residential, office and retail uses. This is realistic when the transit system is designed with development in mind - development-oriented transit - and results in a convenient and efficient travel option for residents, workers and shoppers.
Tough Decisions Unavoidable
TBARTA's daunting task also is our community's chance to strengthen the connection between smart, sustainable development and transportation. For example, while I agree that urban centers are of great importance for transit hubs, large job growth is not just occurring in our downtowns but also in our suburban areas.
In fact, the majority of development in the last 20 years for office and associated commercial has been built in West Shore, Gateway, along the I-75 corridor and in other areas outside of the downtown cores, a trend that is likely to continue.
As such, I believe we must acknowledge that smart growth includes locating transportation nodes in existing suburban development so that people have easy access to a regional network near these employment centers, commercial and residential.
Today, we are at the precipice of incredibly important transportation decisions - decisions that will be instrumental in capturing the full potential of our great community. And as we face difficult - oftentimes conflicting - choices throughout this process, it will be paramount that we work together to create consensus that will support sustainable economic growth and protect our quality of life - a critical element of which is a healthy regional transit network.
So, when you think TOD, think Washington, D.C.'s Metro or the "tube" in London - efficiently designed, incorporating existing and planned development as well as redevelopment areas, and complementary to the economic vitality of its region.
Scott J. Jones is vice president of operations at Newland Communities, a member of TBARTA Citizens Advisory Committee and the Hillsborough County Transportation Task Force.
Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)
* Keep it clean
* Respect others
* Don't hate
* Don't use language you wouldn't use with your mom
* Use "Report Inappropriate Comments" link when necessary
* See Member Agreement for details
TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online Member Agreement | Privacy Statement | Work With Us
Reader Comments
Posted by ( Swathslayer ) on March 18, 2008 at 2:52 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
It appears that TBARTA feels the need to pave the way for the developers. Since when is Newland Communities a "citizen". Don't you think that real citizens, not connected to the developement industry should have a seat at the table, too?
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( George_UCAN ) on March 18, 2008 at 2:53 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Yes we have a "once in a region's lifetime opportunity" to design a mobility plan. Unfortunately, we are flawed in our approach.
Flawed? Yes, flawed.
We need adequate representation for the region's residents in this plan. After all, that's who the plan will ultimately serve. Our citizen committee should be comprised of people that have no ties to the development industry.
With all due respect, Mr Jones can't truly represent our interests. He was appointed by developer-friendly Commissioner Hagan and works for a development company who's profit margin will be directly influenced by how the plan is written. We're not surprised. All of Hillsborough's growth committees, citizen or otherwise, are made up of mostly people with development ties. Another flaw is that the TBARTA leadership subscribes to the false premise that Florida must develop to accomodate future demand, no matter what the cost (in terms of the extinction of open land and lifestyles, natural resources and degrading the quality of life for existing residents). Your average citizen believes otherwise. They don't want development interests writing the plans for them. Before we start putting lines on maps and creating future mobility solutions we need strong leaders to pledge that we will attempt to accomodate anticipated growth, but not at any cost. And once our leaders pledge that they will do that, they will then have to stock the citizen committees with 100% real citizens. At that point we can put together a meaningful plan that truly serves our needs, instead of having the development lobby creating transportation solutions based on how they'd like to develop our land.
Report Inappropriate Comments