Snipes family photo
Christopher Snipes' attorney says a sheriff's detective changed an address on a search warrant, then forged the judge's initials next to the changes.
ADVERTISEMENT
Published: May 13, 2008
Updated: 05/13/2008 04:18 pm
TAMPA - A defense attorney suspects that the apartment number on a search warrant – crossed out, changed and initialed – was forged by a Hillsborough County sheriff's detective so it would look like a judge made the alterations.
On the last page of the search warrant, the apartment number 203 is crossed out in two locations and replaced by the number 208. Next to the new numbers are the letters "CAT," the initials for Circuit Judge Chet A. Tharpe, who signed the warrant allowing the search.
Today, Ruskin attorney Paul Carr filed a sworn affidavit by the judge, who maintains that the changes "are not my true initials, is not my handwriting and were not placed there by me."
Carr said sheriff's Detective Ronnie Cooper applied for and executed the search warrant. Cooper was helped by Stuart Bell, a deputy who was fired this year and is facing criminal drug charges.
Chief Deputy Jose Docobo said he has not been provided much information from Carr regarding this accusation, and he criticized Carr for going to the media instead of discussing it with the sheriff's office.
Docobo said this "could be a matter of recollection," considering the warrant is 2 years old and judges sign so many of them.
Tom Scarritt, a Tampa attorney not affiliated with the case, said Tharpe's words in his affidavit are not phrased as if he is unsure.
"I would find it highly unlikely that it would be a recollection issue when a judge signs a sworn affidavit," Scarritt said. "To me, a judge would not sign an affidavit unless he had a positive recollection as to what he had done."
Carr said he thinks it was Cooper, not Bell, who signed Tharpe's initials to the search warrant. The number 208 was unique in that the eight was drawn with two individual circles on top of one another.
"Judge Tharpe doesn't make his eights that way; neither do I," Carr said. "But Detective Cooper does."
Two handwriting experts are working on the issue, Carr said.
Docobo said Cooper has had an "impeccable" reputation as a detective.
"He's never given us any reason to be concerned," Docobo said.
Sheriff's officials said Cooper is an active detective and is on duty this evening. Cooper declined a request for comment.
Bell was suspended in January and later fired after allegations surfaced that he falsified reports in a different case. Bell was arrested on charges that he illegally removed bottles of the drug oxycodone from a suspect's home, removed some of the pills and falsified reports. He was also charged with fraudulently obtaining drugs from a physician after an internal investigation showed he received controlled drugs from two doctors within a 30-day period.
His criminal case is pending.
Carr has filed a request that Circuit Judge Daniel Sleet throw out charges against his client, Christopher Snipes, based on the forged warrant and subsequent false arrest.
On Oct. 9, 2006, court documents state, Cooper and Bell began to investigate Snipes for selling oxycodone. They used a confidential informant, who the detectives said bought the drug from Snipes in a Brandon apartment on two occasions.
On Oct. 13, 2006, Cooper met with Tharpe and asked for a search warrant, which the judge signed.
The next day, Cooper served the warrant on apartment 208, Carr said. Deputies found marijuana, cocaine, illegal pills, drug paraphernalia and guns, according to court documents.
Snipes spoke to the deputies and made incriminating statements, saying he owned the drugs and items in the apartment.
Snipes' arrest, however, was illegal because the search warrant was invalid, Carr argues.
Federal law prohibits anyone from forging a judge's name. The offender can be punished by up to five years in prison, according to court documents.
Assistant State Attorney Mike Sinacore said his office will look into the allegation of forgery to see whether the search warrant was valid. It is too early to tell whether this will affect other cases investigated by Cooper or Bell, Sinacore said.
Snipes' father, Michael, said he will be patient and see what the investigation reveals.
"I think a lot of people have some explaining to do," he said. "I'll just wait and see what happens."
Snipes' mother, Brenda, said she is outraged that her son was arrested on a false warrant and wonders how some law enforcement officers feel they are allowed to break the law.
"They need to quit thinking they are above the law," she said. "This was not a mistake somebody made. He did that intentionally."
Brenda Snipes said she knows her son had been prescribed some drugs and had a problem with them. She said she knew nothing about the accusation that her son sold drugs to a confidential informant but acknowledged that her son was not an "angel."
"It doesn't matter," she said. "It's still wrong."
Reporter Thomas W. Krause can be reached at (813) 259-7698 or tkrause@tampatrib.com.
(Requires free registration.)
* Keep it clean
* Respect others
* Don't hate
* Don't use language you wouldn't use with your mom
* Use "Report Inappropriate Comments" link when necessary
* See Member Agreement for details
TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online Member Agreement | Privacy Statement | Work With Us
Reader Comments
Posted by ( RangerDave ) on May 13, 2008 at 12:39 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I've seen them do that in movies all the time? You mean, you really can't do that in real life?
Don't tell Crockett and Tubbs that!
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( Longball ) on May 13, 2008 at 1:50 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Free man walkin!... Free man walkin here!...Free man walkin!
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( TopCTO ) on May 13, 2008 at 2:24 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
She is outraged that her son was arrested on a false warrant and wonders how some law enforcement officers feel they are allowed to break the law...
Well let's see .... Deputies found marijuana, cocaine, illegal pills, drug paraphernalia and guns ... I guess Mr. Snipes thought he was allowed to break the law. AND she was not outraged at this!!!! Must be why her son is the way he is.
"I think a lot of people have some explaining to do," ... Yea I guess your son does....
The deputies should have gone through the right channels to correct the warrant.
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( MelisT ) on May 13, 2008 at 2:28 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
These guys know they loose their whole case if that warrent isn't flawless! I don't believe this for a second. These judges sign and initial how many documents a day?!?!? Do they keep record of all of them?!?!?!
So some pos drug dealer is getting off cause more than likely this old judge cant remember signing a document. *typical*
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( ko777 ) on May 13, 2008 at 2:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Tampa's finest at it again its makes you wonder what else are they falsifying to meet (Their) needs?????
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( nuthnfiner ) on May 13, 2008 at 3:04 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
I've got to agree with TopCTO here. If the cops screwed around with the warrant, they need to be severly punished, and if the guy gets off, that's the way our system has to work.
But all this righteous indignation by the guy's mother because the cops might have broken the law....give me a break. Best to not say anything at all, because you and your son certainly don't occupy the moral high ground here.
OK, he got addicted to prescription drugs...happens a lot, but he also had pot and guns. Who's fault is it he's "addicted" to those.
Unbelievable...please honey, you and your son need to take some responsibility for your lives and shut up.
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( 91stormvet ) on May 13, 2008 at 3:09 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
two wrongs do not equal a right! Defendent Guitly Yep! Going Free because cop thought he was above the law? Yep! Cops wonder why they no longer have the trust of the public? Odd!
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( lolalove222 ) on May 13, 2008 at 3:11 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
MelisT ~ He signed an affidavit swearing that it wasn't his handwriting (the judge). I doubt he forgot. I could look at a reciept from 6 years ago that I more than likely will not remember signing, but I'm sure I could tell if it was my own handwriting.
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( 3bullies ) on May 13, 2008 at 3:18 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It's probably a duck! Snipes is a POS, probably has always been a POS and probably will always be a POS. But a POSSIBLE technical oversight on the part of one or both detectives, who by the way did an outstanding job of identifying a tremendous POS in the community. Coupled with a senile old man who shouldn't be allowed to drive let alone rule on peoples lives and can't remember what happened on murder she wrote last night. And this winner gets to go free? If they planted the evidence while he was away at church, I could see it. But they found Guns, Marijuana, oxycodone, and other illegal pills in his possession. All of which I hope he gets to sell to Carr's children. And he admitted they were his. Do we really want this Richard Cranium on the streets?
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( JLJ ) on May 13, 2008 at 9:37 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Judges make changes to court docments every day on the bench. I find it hard to believe he can remember adocument he signed two years ago.
If the cops did do it, punish the cops involved but let the evidence stand and move on.
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( MamaMagic ) on May 13, 2008 at 11:57 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Agree with TopCTO and Nuthnfiner--mother needs to get her head out of the sand.
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( Unimpressed ) on May 14, 2008 at 1:51 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I wouldn't want to mess with the cops. People who mess with cops have a tendency to turn up dead...
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( whasup ) on May 14, 2008 at 2:18 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
Back in high school, I was tricked into going 'Snipe' huntin'.
I could've told the detective that huntin' for Snipes was futile.
I'm getting tired of reading about how the cops are breaking the laws when it comes to solving cases.
There's a murder case on which they just lost their illegally obtained confession because they ignored the constitution.
Now this...
Not to mention one of the cops that was assigned to this case is now a defendant himself.
Shortcuts are not the way to grab the golden ring. Hard work, persistence, crossing i's and dotting t's...but, of course, not in the case of forging the i's and t's...is the way to make a case...
Sign 'em all up for a refresher case in COP101. And please, Mr. and Ms. Police, quit expecting us to respect the laws while you and your cohorts are breaking them. You are all going to have to earn our respect back because this is the last straw...and you've only got yourselves to blame.
Report Inappropriate Comments
Posted by ( deez ) on May 14, 2008 at 12:29 p.m. ( Suggest removal )
Case Law would have protected the detectives in this case regardless if they had the correct apartment number typed on the search warrant. The incorrect apartment number doesn't subtract from the fact that the RIGHT subject was arrested and charged. The apartment number doesn't have anything to do with the fact that the RIGHT subject delivered dope to the detective not once, but twice! I wonder, is Paul Carr as innocent as the people he defends?
Report Inappropriate Comments