TBO.com - TBO is Tampa Bay Online

Restitution Trumps Prison In Vehicular Homicide Case

ADVERTISEMENT

By STEPHEN THOMPSON | The Tampa Tribune

Published: May 19, 2008

ST. PETERSBURG - A Bradenton man who witnesses said was driving recklessly when his car collided with an armored truck on Interstate 275 three years ago, killing the armored truck driver, will not spend a day in jail.

Donald Reese, 53, pleaded no contest this month to a charge of vehicular homicide and was sentenced to probation after his attorney successfully argued it would be better for Reese to pay restitution to the estate of the dead man than spend any time in prison, court records show.

The amount Reese was ordered to pay the estate of Ira Stringfield is $2,750, computerized court records show. Reese paid the money Friday, six days after he entered his plea.

Reese also was ordered to pay restitution to Stringfield's passenger, Jesus Perez-Guillermety, who was injured in the wreck. That amount was $1,575. He also was told to pay the Florida Highway Patrol $5,342, court records show.

This restitution was settled Friday, also, court records show.

On May 2, 2005, witnesses say, Reese was driving a Miata recklessly on Interstate 275 when the Miata collided with the armored truck just north of the Roosevelt Boulevard exit, court records state. The Miata was weaving in and out of traffic and was going 10 to 15 mph over the speed limit, witnesses told authorities.

After the Miata struck the armored truck, the armored truck flipped on its side and skidded across the road, through a guardrail and into an embankment, court records state.

Reese was looking at a possible prison sentence. But his attorney, Kevin Hayslett, asked for a downward departure from sentencing guidelines on the grounds that the crime was committed in an unsophisticated manner, it was an isolated incident for which Reese showed remorse, and that restitution to the victims outweighed the need for a prison sentence.

"Because the need for Mr. Reese to pay restitution to the Stringfield estate and to Mr. Guillermety outweighs the utility of his incarceration, and also because Mr. Reese would be fully able to pay restitution, this court should sentence him below the sentencing guidelines," Hayslett wrote in a motion that eventually was granted.

"Mr. Reese has the finances to make significant and prompt restitution to the victims," Hayslett's motion states.

"In this case, the victims are in great need of restitution because the decedent's family lost a significant source of income and Mr. Guillermety suffered injuries that would have accumulated medical bills," the motion states.

"Mr. Reese exercised poor judgment but never possessed any intent to commit a crime or to cause harm," the motion states.

It could not be determined what prison time Reese originally faced or whether Stringfield's survivors or Perez-Guillermety were in favor of the plea deal. Assistant State Attorney Holly Grissinger did not return a telephone call.

Reporter Stephen Thompson can be reached at (727) 451-2336 or spthompson@tampatrib.com.

Share this:

Loading Comments...

Email Print

ADVERTISEMENT