Tribune photo by JAY NOLAN
Attendant Harvey Simmons waves cars into a parking lot owned by Penet Land Co. along 15th Street south of 7th Avenue in Ybor City.
ADVERTISEMENT
Published: September 16, 2008
TAMPA - From her bungalow on Sixth Avenue, Sandra Jackson watches the spectacle of partygoers drinking and playing loud music and fighting every weekend.
When the nightclubs empty, the party moves to dozens of dimly lit parking lots in Ybor City that are little more than grassy fields.
"It goes on all night," Jackson said. "And those kids have no respect for anyone."
Like many Ybor residents, she wants the city to get rid of the lots.
But it's not that simple.
The city says the owners have a right to operate the lots, despite the fact that they were meant to be a temporary solution to a parking problem largely resolved during the past decade.
Instead, the city has a plan to improve the appearance and safety of the lots by forcing owners to comply with a new set of regulations. By requiring landscaping and lighting, pavement in common areas, security, and signs with rates and a contact number for emergencies, city officials hope to alleviate many of the complaints residents have with the parking lots.
Longtime Ybor residents say the city's plan misses the bigger point.
"These lots should not be a part of the landscape of a historic district," said Dan Snow, a resident and cigar bar manager. "We would rather see new homes and businesses."
Some Say Fix Will Fuel Problem
Ybor residents have fought for years to get the lots removed, arguing that they invite loitering, fights and other troubles. The lots, mostly vacant industrial and housing sites dating to the 1970s, were meant to be a temporary fix for overflow parking.
Since the lots came into existence about 10 years ago, the city has built two parking garages, added surface parking and removed the coin meters for off-street parking in the neighborhood. In all, that's nearly 3,000 spots in Ybor, more than enough to handle the demand during the weekends.
Despite that, the privately owned lots have proliferated, in part because of loosely defined rules on interim parking and lax enforcement.
After working on the new rules for a year, city officials say that while they can't get rid of them, at least they can force property owners to improve the appearance of the lots. If the proposed changes are approved by the city council, lot owners would need zoning approval from the city to stay in business.
"We plan to aggressively enforce the new standards," said Gloria Moreda, the city's land development and zoning manager, who worked on the proposed changes.
Even if strictly enforced, the changes will do little to alleviate loitering and crime, said Joe Howden, owner of King Corona Cigars on Seventh Avenue and a member of the Historic Ybor City Neighborhood Civic Association.
By adopting rules to allow the lots to stay in business, he said, the city, "will legitimize these parking lots and possibly allow them to proliferate."
'We Don't Want Them'
The privately owned lots number about two dozen and are closer to many of the restaurants and nightclubs than the city's garages on Palm and Fifth avenues.
Most of the lots have a parking attendant and charge $5 to $10 a night. Some have valet parking and Web sites. Others are vacant lots owned by developers and out-of-town investment companies.
Few have invested much in the properties, residents and city officials say.
"They're getting a maximum profit for a minimum investment," Howden said.
Tony LaColla, president of the neighborhood's civic association, said the city's proposal isn't the perfect solution, but he hopes it will help to resolve some problems.
"We don't want them in the neighborhood, but this makes them palatable," he said.
The city and neighborhood groups are discussing the lighting and security, LaColla said, but haven't come to a consensus on the proposed requirements.
"We really need to address those issues," he said.
Tampa police say they have increased their presence in the neighborhood on the weekends, putting plainclothes officers on patrol in the lots. Forcing owners to improve the lot conditions will help.
"We can't do this by ourselves," police spokeswoman Laura McElroy said.
Howden, for one, remains doubtful that the changes will have a major effect.
"Why are they assuming that because they put in some lights and shrubbery that it's going to improve the safety?" he said. "This plan makes our problems permanent."
POSSIBLE LAWS OF THE LAND
Here are some of the proposed requirements:
Landscaping: Parking lots with more than 7,500-square-feet would be required to add trees and shrubbery along perimeters. Parking lots with less square footage than that would not have to add landscaping but would be required to install a 3-foot-high fence.
Signs: Owners would be required to install signs at the entrance to the parking lot gate that name the company or person responsible for the lot, a 24-hour contact number, cost of parking and the address of the parking lot. Signs would be a minimum of 4 feet.
Lighting and security: Parking lots would have to have overhead lighting that meets city standards. Owners would be required to have at least one security person on duty from sunset until 4 a.m. or until patrons have left. Some would be exempt from the changes.
Paving and surface: Entrances to the parking lots would have to be paved. All parking spots would have to be level turf or hard rock surfaces.
Irrigation: If the parking lots have grass and shrubbery, owners would be required to use manual watering or an irrigation system on a timer to maintain landscaping.
Reporter Christian M. Wade can be reached at (813) 259-7679 or cwade@tampatrib.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online ©2009 Media General Communications Holdings, LLC. A Media General company. Member Agreement | Privacy Statement | Work With Us
| * To: | |
| Your Name: | |
| Your Email Address: | |
| Personal Message [optional]: | |