ADVERTISEMENT
Published: September 23, 2008
Huddled around tables in a private Georgetown garden, we waited for the main event, the reason that we had given up our evening: the promise of a bipartisan discussion on the major foreign-policy issues facing the United States.
Finally, Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser under former President Jimmy Carter, and Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser under former Presidents Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush, took the stage. The conversation moved ahead in ways that I had not observed in the political arena for years. Naturally, I was eager to pick up a new book, "America and the World," which is a series of conversations between Brzezinski and Scowcroft. In a chapter titled "The Politics of Cultural Dignity," Scowcroft talked about the nation-state, including its changing status and diminishing role. "The major challenge is that the whole world is changing at once, and this so-called information age is literally transforming the world we all know and the institutions with which we are familiar."
Brzezinski agreed, adding that "the traditional problems of power and geopolitics are still with us." He indicated that the global political awakening is creating widespread intolerance, impatience with inequality, jealousy, resentment and more rapid immigration. Complicating the discussion are environmental troubles, the threat to the human condition associated with climate change and the potential for deliberately inflicted massive lethality, he said.
To Scowcroft, politically responsible people have not fully understood the urgency of taking action in this clashing-worlds arena. He believes that a spotlight on human dignity would position the United States to deal more effectively with the most pressing issues.
So, what does all of this translate into regarding the next U.S. president?
In general, Scowcroft recommended a review of the structures in use for national-security purposes, which were designed for the Cold War, not our rapidly evolving world. He argued for a system to manage issues that cut across traditional boundaries. Brzezinski, for his part, recommended an effective, centralized, strategic planning mechanism. He would start with mission-oriented presidential task forces assigned to climate change, Middle East conflict (incorporating the Arab-Israeli dispute, Iraq and Iran) and alliance relationships. Scowcroft also urged a Middle East focus, but would break it into parts: the Palestinian question, Iraq and Iran, Afghanistan and perhaps Pakistan.
To improve U.S. relations with the world, Brzezinski suggested outlawing torture and otherwise burying the "culture of fear." Scowcroft recommended that the United States acknowledge its imperfections, while simultaneously encouraging the viewpoints and advice of other nations through strategic communication.
And then they turned to the issue of the increasingly polarized debate in Washington. Brzezinski said that it is essential for the next president to make a deliberate effort to create bipartisanship, including through appointments. Scowcroft said simply that when faced with a threat, we must subordinate partisan differences. He urged the next president to resume the practice of calling congressional leaders in just to talk, and bringing the opposition into the cabinet room for discussions.
I may be dreaming in my hope that some of this constructive atmosphere might spill over into the remainder of the presidential campaign. But, in truth, the American people deserve - and should demand - no less.
John C. Bersia is the special assistant to the president for global perspectives at the University of Central Florida.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online ©2009 Media General Communications Holdings, LLC. A Media General company. Member Agreement | Privacy Statement | Work With Us
| * To: | |
| Your Name: | |
| Your Email Address: | |
| Personal Message [optional]: | |