WFLA News Channel 8 The Tampa Tribune CentroTampa.com

TBO.com - Tampa Bay Online

Print This Print Bookmark and Share XML Feed For This Channel

TBO > News

Overseas Agenda

ADVERTISEMENT

Published: January 4, 2009

WASHINGTON - The international to-do list President George W. Bush hands to his successor has a lot of boxes marked "incomplete." Some of Bush's foreign policy and security priorities were overtaken by the two expensive wars that outlast him. In other cases, Bush ran out of time or political capital, or was vexed by the realities of a new world where even close allies don't always cater to American whims.

How are U.S. international objectives different now than they were when Bush took office?

The main difference in U.S. strategy and goals at the close of the Bush administration arises from a national war footing that has largely defined the Bush years. Bush took office in 2000 with foreign policy advisers disdainful of Bill Clinton's internationalist approach and hardly alarmist about the threat of terrorism.

Caught by surprise by the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush ordered the invasion of Afghanistan before his first year in office had ended, and the invasion of Iraq less than two years later, in 2003. The demands on troops, money, planning and decision-making have reordered other goals and made some much harder to reach.

The terrorist attacks in India offer a recent practical example. Quickly blamed on a terrorist group based in Pakistan, the attacks have threatened to rekindle a military standoff between nuclear-armed neighbors that have fought three wars in 60 years.

American officials have been worried that Pakistan might divert troops and resources from its fight against insurgents who attack U.S. forces in neighboring Afghanistan.

What's the biggest global problem Bush tried to solve but couldn't?

The spread of radical and often violent anti-American orthodoxy that led to the Sept. 11 attacks has only intensified. Bush's answer, which Obama partly rejects, is a military and intelligence assault on terrorists coupled with a campaign to spread democratic ideals and intellectual freedom in the Muslim world and beyond.

Does that mean terrorism remains the greatest global security threat to the United States?

Probably, and especially when combined with the instability and uncertainty of the current global economic crisis. Terrorism and related tactics used by insurgencies have supplanted nuclear war as the threat against which the United States designs much of its defense.

What would Obama do differently?

Obama is highly critical of what advisers call Bush's overreach in the battle against terrorism, an approach embodied by the long-term housing of terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Obama says he will try to restore America's moral leadership in the world, a long-term and inexact prescription. For starters, Obama insists he will close Guantanamo.

What are other priorities?

Apart from the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the top security trouble spots are identified as Iran, the broader Middle East, Pakistan and North Korea. Russia has re-entered the top tier of worrisome nations in the wake of its invasion of U.S.-backed Georgia last summer.

Is Iran a bigger threat to the United States now, and what would Obama do to lessen the risks?

During the Bush administration, Iran moved closer to being able to build a nuclear weapon, should it choose to do so. Iran insists its nuclear-development program is peaceful but has refused international demands to scale it back. U.S. policy toward Tehran under Bush was inconsistent and sometimes seemed to work at cross purposes. Bush leaves Obama with a framework to talk to Iranian leaders about the nuclear program or other issues, and Obama has said he would pursue tough-minded diplomacy.

Wasn't there a deal to get rid of nuclear weapons in North Korea?

North Korea fielded a working nuclear device in 2006, an event that reinvigorated international efforts to buy off the isolated and impoverished regime. The North did agree to give up its weapons but has dragged out every step of a negotiation with the United States and other nations.

Loading Comments...
Loading
Print This Print AddThis Social Bookmark Button XML Feed For This Channel
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles
Oops! Your email could not be sent because of the following errors: