The state wants to hold teachers accountable for student achievement. At first, it sounds logical. Teachers are responsible for student learning. The problem lies in the state's definition of achievement.
To our legislators, achievement equals higher test scores. Ask any educator in the current system, and he or she will tell you that student achievement is much more than one test result.
We teach the whole child. We teach them how to listen, learn and be respectful. We teach children manners, how to play well with others and how to cooperate. We teach them to be on time to class, how to dress appropriately and use proper grammar. Where do these necessities fall into the state's definition of achievement?
Everyone will agree that one of the most important reasons for education is to sustain and promote our democracy. Teachers are working hard every day to teach citizenship to our students by teaching them responsibility and tolerance. We teach them about the effects of the choices they make, good and bad. Where are these principles found in a state test?
Students are individuals. Every student has different needs, and achievement or learning gains look different for every student. Most educators agree that we should be held accountable for the learning that takes place in our classrooms. However, the state needs to recognize that real, life-long learning is not exemplified in one test.
AMY MILLER
Tampa
Email
Facebook
Google
Twitter
Favorites
More
Advertisement
Advertisement